🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume atomic talks with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Path

The foreign minister is treading a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states employed their right to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in various formats if talks resume.

Trump recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence challenging to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always attempted to enforce their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and remains the ultimate resolution to settle disputes, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the identical tone."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the state in the face of this invasion."